Table of Contents
The Hamilton Insurgency Continues
While the American Association of University Women鈥檚 extremely misguided sexual harassment report might give you reason to believe otherwise, all the news this week has not been bad. Specifically, 蜜桃直播 has heard good tidings out of New York State, where fresh trustee elections are going on at Hamilton College. To get some context, check out what then鈥撁厶抑辈 President David French wrote last July:
Like Dartmouth, Hamilton has a mechanism for open trustee elections, and, for the first time in many years, those elections are contested. Several alumni have formed a group called Hamilton College Alumni for Governance Reform and have put forward three candidates who hope to 鈥渞estore Hamilton鈥檚 reputation and credibility as one of the premier liberal arts institutions in the world.鈥Unfortunately (but, given Hamilton鈥檚 history, unsurprisingly), the dissident candidates face severe free speech restrictions on their campaigns. The candidates are limited to a single 100-word statement of candidacy to be mailed to alumni, and that statement 鈥渕ay not include any contact information or references to specific hard copy or online resource material.鈥 In other words, candidates have 100 words in which to make their case and cannot refer alumni to a website. Further, candidates may not even be permitted to use email for campaign purposes. How can a candidate run an effective campaign offering a comprehensive critique of the status quo in 100 words? How can they get their message to the voting alumni without references to additional materials or e-mails? More importantly, how are such draconian free speech restrictions at all consistent with representative democracy and academic freedom?While open trustee elections are a credit to Hamilton College, the college should immediately lift its free speech restrictions and permit a real debate and a real choice for its alumni.
We later dubbed these insurgent candidates 鈥The Hamilton Insurgency鈥 and commended their apparent commitment to freedom of speech鈥攂ut thanks in large part to Hamilton鈥檚 restrictions on the election, they lost. The good news, though, is that not only is the Hamilton College Alumni for Governance Reform (HCAGR) group fielding candidates again right now, but the college has also liberalized its election procedures. Here is how Hunter Brown, the head of HCAGR, :
It appears that the explicit and direct prohibitions of free speech of the candidates, specifically against the provision of contact data and references to hard copy material or on-line resources in the statements of candidacy, have been removed from this year's rules.We welcome and applaud the change and hope it reflects a thoughtful return to Hamilton's traditional principles and not a situational assessment of the public ridicule that would have otherwise ensued.Why an institution that vigorously proclaims itself to be committed to free speech and the free and open exchange of ideas had those restrictions in the first place is a question worth considering.And one that bears on the votes to be cast in this coming election.
Indeed. 蜜桃直播 joins HCAGR in applauding Hamilton鈥檚 changes鈥攂ut as we have been pointing out for months, if the college truly loves liberty (as its policies claim), there is more to do.
For more on the trustee race, see HCAGR鈥檚 .
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

People want AI regulation 鈥 but they don鈥檛 trust the regulators
As AI reshapes the world around us, survey data shows rising support for its regulation. Are we protecting society, or baking censorship into our digital future?

Introducing Expression, 蜜桃直播's official new Substack
Free speech has a new home. 蜜桃直播 is now on Substack 鈥 delivering fearless commentary, analysis, and storytelling straight to your inbox. Join the conversation.

No gay rights without free expression
蜜桃直播鈥檚 latest rankings show alarming support for censorship among LGBT students. But as Kirchick explains, there would be no LGBT rights without free speech.

University of Michigan has ended private surveillance contracts but the chill on free speech remains
After public outcry, UMich ditched its private spy firm 鈥 but the damage is done. Students may no longer be watched, but the chill on campus speech is alive and well.