Table of Contents
ֱ statement on Supreme Court’s ruling in TikTok v. Garland
The Supreme Court today ruled that a federal law compelling TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to sell the social media platform or cease operations in the United States does not violate the First Amendment. The law functionally requires TikTok to shut down its operations by Jan. 19 absent some other accommodation.
FIRE issued the following statement:
Our unique national commitment to freedom of expression requires more caution than today’s ruling delivers. The unprecedented ban of a communication platform used by 170 million Americans demands strict judicial scrutiny, not the rushed and highly deferential review the Supreme Court instead conducted.
The Court explicitly notes the “inherent narrowness” of today’s decision. ֱ will hold it to that promise, and fight to contain the threat the ruling poses to our First Amendment rights.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ֱ.
ֱ answers your questions
Podcast
Texas runs afoul of the First Amendment with new limits on faculty course materials
Free speech advocates rally to support ֱ’s defense of First Amendment protections for drag shows