Table of Contents
Cameron U. Supposedly Revises Unconstitutional Policies After Student Files Suit

Cameron University got a mention on The Torch last May for its unconstitutional restrictions on student speech and for one administrator鈥檚 patently incorrect suggestion that university policies trump the First Amendment.
As I reported at the time, Cameron student Daniel Harper against the public university in Oklahoma after he was told he could not distribute his flyers criticizing a religious group because they were allegedly 鈥渙ffensive鈥 and 鈥渄iscriminatory.鈥 The university鈥檚 鈥淓xpressive Activity鈥 policy also stated that materials to be distributed must be approved by the Director of Student Development in advance. Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represented Harper, reported last week that Cameron has in order to comply with the First Amendment.
This is welcome news, and 蜜桃直播 commends Cameron for finally taking steps to ensure that its students can speak freely on campus. However, the university鈥檚 old, problematic policies , and ADF鈥檚 press release went out eight days ago. Thus, students who haven鈥檛 followed the news pertaining to the lawsuit will continue to believe they must comply with these vague and overbroad restrictions. Cameron would be well advised, accordingly, to update its policies online and remove any confusion about students鈥 free speech rights on campus.
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Don鈥檛 let Texas criminalize free political speech in the name of AI regulation

Brendan Carr鈥檚 Bizarro World FCC

Day 100! Abridging the First Amendment: Zick releases major resource report on Trump鈥檚 executive orders 鈥 First Amendment News 468聽
